Friday, December 21, 2012

KOHC - Kohat Cement Limited - Analysis - 21/12/2012

Company KOHC Symbol
Company Name Kohat Cement Limited Company Name
Avg EPS Rs 2.67 Average of past year end EPS's
Avg EPS FV Rs 28.11 Fair Value based on average of past year end EPS's
EPS Rs 15.61 Last four quarters EPS
EPS FV Rs 164.32 Fair Value based on last four quarters EPS
Current Price Rs 71.87 Last closing stock price
Updated December 2012 Data Month/Year
Div Rs 3.00 Total dividend paid during last four quarters
Div FV Rs 31.58 Fair value based on total dividend paid during last four quarters
Avg Div Rs 0.33 Average of yearly dividends paid (including currently paid ones)
Avg Div FV Rs 3.51 Fair value based on Average of yearly dividends paid (including currently paid ones)
Avg Rs 39.85 Fair value (averaged of other fair value)
Upside -44.56% Upside potential (in percentage) based on the above Average.
Div Yield 4.17% Dividend yield
Book Value Rs 32.89 Book Value
Sector Construction and Materials (Cement) Sector
FV CF/S Rs 38.67 Fair Value based on cash flow per share
Outstanding Shares 128,757,240 Number of  Outstanding Shares
Current Assets Rs 2,195.00 Currency in Millions of Pakistan Rupees
Total Liabilities Rs 4,789.00 Currency in Millions of Pakistan Rupees
NCAV/S Rs -20.15 Net Current Asset Value / Share
Total Assets Rs 9,024.00 Currency in Millions of Pakistan Rupees
Quarter September 2012 Data Quarter
CfO Rs 473.00 CASH FROM OPERATIONS (Millions of Rs)
CF/S Rs 3.67 Cash Flow per Share
Symbol KOHC
Current Price Rs 66.79
Previous Day Price Rs 65.75
Daily Return 1.58%
Price Week Ago Rs 64.19
Weekly Return 4.05%
Price Month Ago Rs 61.52
Monthly Return 8.57%
Price Quarter Ago Rs 59.19
Quarterly Return 12.84%
Price Year Ago Rs 7.85
Yearly Return 750.83%

Share/Bookmark

2 comments:

  1. Upside potential as per this analysis says, its -40% but in reality KOHC has moves straight around 149% since last 7 months.

    Can you explain value and purpose of these analysis that you are putting up on this site, if these are not reflecting ground realities??

    regards,
    Sh.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your critical comments. Here are some views that I would like to share regarding your observation;
    1- Upside potential is just one parameter in the above analysis. Its based on company financials, that is, how the company should be, ideally valued, if based on the inputs that went into that parameter. If you look in the Yearly Return row, you would see a still higher number to the one presented in upside potential.
    2- This is an analysis that was done several months ago, almost 2 quarters ago.
    3- These analysis are not predictive in nature. They are not buy and sell technical signals. They show the financial strength or weakness of a company, based on the limited set of data that goes in.
    4- The ground realities that you have alluded to are not calculable. No method exists that could tell you the future price of a stock, at any given date in future.
    5- Upside potential is an averaged value arrived at by averaging several individual fair values given in the analysis. It is meant to give a summary of what all the other fair values seem to be indicating. If you don't like this metric you can pick any other fair value from the analysis. These fair values are very conservative in nature, they don't take any potential future growth into account (since such projection lies in future and that future has not happened yet and therefore is a mere conjecture).
    6- As I said earlier that these analysis do not predict what path the stock price will take, they only say that if stock price were to be based of past financial data and on the limited set of data items that went into the analysis then this could be the best price to pay for a share of the company being analyzed. The actual share price is based not on company financials, but on emotional speculative nature on the traders on a particular day.

    Please do keep coming back to this site, with more insights. You are very welcome and if you don't agree to the above (which you certainly would not, then do leave a comment stating why was it so).

    ReplyDelete