Secondly, analysts fail to understand that earnings growth is a highly mean-reverting process over a 5-year time period. The base rate for mean reversion is very high. The low-growth portfolio generates nearly as much long-term earnings growth as the high-growth portfolio. Effectively, analysts judge companies by how they appear, rather than how likely they are to sustain their competitive edge with a growing earnings base."
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Analysts suffer representativeness twice over!
"The results show that analysts suffer representativeness twice over. Firstly, companies that have seen high growth in the previous 5 years are forecast to continue to see very high earnings growth in the next 5 years. Analysts are effectively looking at the company’s past performance and saying ‘this company has been great, and hence it will continue to be great’, or ‘this company is a dog and it will always be a dog’.
Secondly, analysts fail to understand that earnings growth is a highly mean-reverting process over a 5-year time period. The base rate for mean reversion is very high. The low-growth portfolio generates nearly as much long-term earnings growth as the high-growth portfolio. Effectively, analysts judge companies by how they appear, rather than how likely they are to sustain their competitive edge with a growing earnings base."
Secondly, analysts fail to understand that earnings growth is a highly mean-reverting process over a 5-year time period. The base rate for mean reversion is very high. The low-growth portfolio generates nearly as much long-term earnings growth as the high-growth portfolio. Effectively, analysts judge companies by how they appear, rather than how likely they are to sustain their competitive edge with a growing earnings base."
Labels:
behavioral investing
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment